<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://ukfilm.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>UKFilm.org - Cinematography</title>
 <link>http://ukfilm.org/taxonomy/term/49/0</link>
 <description>Cinematography &amp; Lighting</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Why do images captured on celluloid have a sort of &quot;glossy look&quot; when well-mastered dv-footage doesn&#039;t?</title>
 <link>http://ukfilm.org/features/why-do-images-captured-on-celluloid-have-a-sort-of-glossy-look-when-well-mastered-dv-footage-doesnt</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s notoriously difficult to make DV look &quot;glossy&quot;.  Why do images originated on celluloid tend to look &lt;em&gt;sexy&lt;/em&gt;?  Can we achieve that same look on DV?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ukfilm.org/features/why-do-images-captured-on-celluloid-have-a-sort-of-glossy-look-when-well-mastered-dv-footage-doesnt&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://ukfilm.org/features/why-do-images-captured-on-celluloid-have-a-sort-of-glossy-look-when-well-mastered-dv-footage-doesnt#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://ukfilm.org/broad-categories/filmmaking">Filmmaking</category>
 <category domain="http://ukfilm.org/content-subject/cinematography">Cinematography</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:28:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">280 at http://ukfilm.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Shooting Super-16mm On A Low Budget</title>
 <link>http://ukfilm.org/news/shooting-super-16mm-on-a-low-budget</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://ukfilm.org/files/16mm_s16mm_camera.jpg&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We&#039;ve got a new article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://ukfilm.org/features/shooting-super16mm&quot;&gt;Shooting Super-16mm On A Low Budget&lt;/a&gt; .  Take a look at why you should still consider shooting on film in today&#039;s digital-centric world and how you can shoot on Super-16mm for less than £1,000.  Read it &lt;a href=&quot;http://ukfilm.org/features/shooting-super16mm&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ukfilm.org/news/shooting-super-16mm-on-a-low-budget&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://ukfilm.org/news/shooting-super-16mm-on-a-low-budget#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://ukfilm.org/broad-categories/filmmaking">Filmmaking</category>
 <category domain="http://ukfilm.org/content-subject/cinematography">Cinematography</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 09:49:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">159 at http://ukfilm.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Shooting Super-16mm On A Low Budget</title>
 <link>http://ukfilm.org/features/shooting-super16mm</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://ukfilm.org/files/16mm_s16mm_camera.jpg&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This article will first look at some of the reasons why you might want to shoot on film and will then go on to consider how to shoot on super-16mm for the least amount of money.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ukfilm.org/features/shooting-super16mm&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://ukfilm.org/features/shooting-super16mm#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://ukfilm.org/broad-categories/filmmaking">Filmmaking</category>
 <category domain="http://ukfilm.org/content-subject/cinematography">Cinematography</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 06:32:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">157 at http://ukfilm.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
